Thats what i was thought about. I send him a email back with that question.
I think i can complete it here localy and after that submit a patch for you guys to submit it to svn. Is that ok ? Or anyone elese want to work on that too ? bye Am Dienstag, den 18.04.2006, 13:03 +0200 schrieb Stefano Bagnara: > Norman Maurer wrote: > > The developer of SPF answers: > > > > Hi Norman, > > > > The current status of SPF is unsupported. > > [..] > > A better idea would be to replace all the native Java DNS calls with > > the DNSJava library ( James currently uses the library ) > > [..] > > Please feel free to fork the code and move it forward. > > I've included a Jar with the latest SPF code, it may be more recent > > than on Sourceforge. > > The only difference is probably some bug fixes. > > > > Regards > > Roger Fullerton > > > > > > So i will modify it to works like it should and build a jar . > > If we want to update it to use xbill's dnsjava and we plan to support > different specifications we probably should fork the source code to > org.apache.james.util.spf > > I don't know the correct way to fork it: what kind of license-header > should we use? > > Stefano > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > !EXCUBATOR:1,4444c81e37024738219861!
signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil
