Am Mittwoch, den 19.04.2006, 13:16 -0400 schrieb Noel J. Bergman: > > If I understood the new code depends on the DNSServer interface, isn't > > it? I don't think we should use org.apache.spf if the code depends on > > org.apache.james.services.DNSServer and on the implementation > < (org.apache.james.dnsserver.DNSServer). > > No, no. It should NOT depend upon our DNS server interface, IMO. It should > depend on DNSJava, which is the same underlying code that our "DNS Server" > service uses. >
Thats right.. thats the changes i made. It now use dnsjava for all dns functions. It will work fully idependent of the james server as "standalone" jar if needed.. > > Furthermore, where do we want to put the SPF functionality? What will > > the SPF "contract" (interface) be to James? > > That contract is what I would put into org.apache.james.util.mail.spf or > whatever named package. That looks like a clean solution
signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil
