Noel J. Bergman wrote:
Furthermore, as I don't like the way current handlers works, I will try
to propose something different (or something built on top of them) for
future James releases, and I would not like to be bound to backward
compatibility for this issue.
Agreed. I still want to go back to handler packages, for example. My
earlier proposal allowed much easier configuration, while still allowing the
standard configuration to be overridden if someone had a need.
Have you any link to your early proposal? I just want to be sure I read it.
Stefano
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
