Bernd Fondermann wrote:
[...]
Not a single message got lost.
No errors in the log files.
[...]
If a test using file repositories yields similar results and all results
still hold for Alpha4, we could consider it stable enough to become a
release candidate, shouldn't we?
Thank you for sharing your results!
I think this is good enough to give us much more confidence but I think
we need much more real world testing before we can trust if enough to
make an RC.
Today I fixed a problem with SMIME mailets, we may have a lot of similar
problems.
I think the status that better describe the current 2.3 branch is "beta".
I currently have a 2.3.0a2 and a 2.3.0a3 in production in very low
traffic servers.
That said I think that using the "RC" sequence in a release would give
us much more tester than the "a" releases, but I would prefer to proceed
by steps.
I would like to know if James works fine under greater load.
+1 to release a "b1" or "a4" asap
Stefano
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
