Am Dienstag, den 23.05.2006, 18:34 +0200 schrieb Stefano Bagnara: > Bernd Fondermann wrote: > > [...] > > Not a single message got lost. > > No errors in the log files. > > [...] > > If a test using file repositories yields similar results and all results > > still hold for Alpha4, we could consider it stable enough to become a > > release candidate, shouldn't we? > > Thank you for sharing your results! > > I think this is good enough to give us much more confidence but I think > we need much more real world testing before we can trust if enough to > make an RC. > > Today I fixed a problem with SMIME mailets, we may have a lot of similar > problems. > > I think the status that better describe the current 2.3 branch is "beta". > > I currently have a 2.3.0a2 and a 2.3.0a3 in production in very low > traffic servers.
Im also.. about 200 Email per day. With mysql as repository. But i only use it as gateway. > > That said I think that using the "RC" sequence in a release would give > us much more tester than the "a" releases, but I would prefer to proceed > by steps. Thats true. Alpha releases scare people. I think its to stable for an alpha now ;-) > > I would like to know if James works fine under greater load. > > +1 to release a "b1" or "a4" asap > > Stefano +1 Norman
signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil
