Norman Maurer wrote:
Same szenario on the AddHeader mailet.
This make me think twice on the previous issue.
Unfortunately we can't change AddHeader to SetHeader for the backward
compatibility issue (right?)
is it better to have consistency between the 2 "processor" classes or is
it better to name the new the right way?
I don't know.
Stefano
Am Montag, den 29.05.2006, 12:08 +0200 schrieb Stefano Bagnara:
Norman Maurer wrote:
Hi guys,
when working on junit test for AddHeaderHandler i notice that the
AddHeaderHandler use setHeader(String name, String value); . So it not
add a header, it set a header. This is not what i espected when i read
the Handlername.
So for me are 2 solutions:
1. Rename the AddHeaderHandler to SetHeaderHandler
+1
2. use addHeader(String name, String value) instand of setHeader(String
name, String value)
i prefer the first. What the you think ?
So do I: The most common usage is replacing/setting headers. Almost no
one use multiple header values.
Stefano
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
