Noel J. Bergman wrote:
Norman Maurer wrote:
I think that should be focused when alan complete his work on maven2
sandbox. Cause we can so depend on some reports that maven2 generate.
The maven reports are really not particularly interesting to me. Why do you
like them?
Test coverage reports for free are good. I also find useful xdocs for
projects I don't have checkedout locally.
You can do this in ant, but you have to configure ant for this, anc
download its dependencies. Maven do this for free and easily.
I had a discussion with someone who has been using Maven extensively on some
ASF projects, and he's promised to stop by later and give us details.
I have 3 cousins that died under a big *ant* and unfortunately won't
tell us the details :-P Just joking.
If you want to talk of ASF projects I see that most of the new and most
active projects are using maven2. The projects I'm following much more
(directory and felix) both use maven2 and are also creating plugins to
improve the maven2<->osgi integration.
Personally, I'm not at all prepared to freeze interfaces between
our "internal" components, and/or declare them ready for standalone use.
Yeah it make some things difficulter but so we maybe get more users
that work with our code and test it.
I believe that more frequent and interesting releases will do that. :-)
The work that Stefano, you and Bernd are doing is tremendously helpful. :-)
--- Noel
Thank you,
interestingness on new releases has 2 side:
- bug fixed
- new features
Stefano
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
