Steve Brewin wrote:
Stefano Bagnara wrote:
<snipped>
I also wrote something really clear: "If I understand your words you
are: -1 to apply the code for a 2.4 release but you don't
apply a veto
if the release will be 3.0 or if we add unit tests, is it right? "
No reply is not a fast solution. 3 days have passed and I
forgot 50% of
the things I needed to understand to refactor Fetchmail. This is all
time lost either way.
Yep! 3 days passed 'cos it was a weekend and a public holiday where I live.
I have other commitments too. And also I would like to leave it open a while
longer so others have time to have their say.
-- Steve
Well, I think this explain why I think that this is not a best practice.
Most James discussions takes weeks and are lost forever with no results.
This is what I don't like.
I don't expect people to be here 24x7 but we can't think we can create a
fast release cycle if we require any commit to pass weeks of discussions.
Btw this is no more urgent to me: I'm not going to commit it even if you
reply a +1, now.
Hope you had good holidays,
Stefano
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
