Norman Maurer wrote:
> i whould like to use setter methods for that in all mailets and matchers
Ah, I just asked you about this. OK, that explains the change we were
discussing. :-)
> Anyone has a problem with that?
On the one hand, Java isn't Smalltalk, and I have little need to treat it as
such when initializing simple private properties, but it might help eclipse
users, since the tool can inspect, and we can centralize logging,
validation, etc., so sure, why not? For protected and public properties,
I'm sure that we're all +1 to proper bean properties.
--- Noel
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
