Am Freitag, den 30.06.2006, 16:29 +0200 schrieb Stefano Bagnara: > A summary of this week: > > Stefano Bagnara wrote: > > I hope we don't need a single vote for every single issue, so please > > help with short and clear "vote like" answers to the points (I prefer a > > clear -1 than a long discussion: at least with a -1 we don't delay the > > next release). > > > > --- Add a default hardcoded configuration for the SMTPHandlerChain > > http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-496 > > > > (I would also like to remove the default handlerchain configuration from > > the default config.xml and maybe add it to a commented complete config.xml) > > 3 +1 Stefano, Norman, Vincenzo > 1 -0 Bernd > > if no other votes in few days I'll backport it. > > > --- Decide what to do with repository implementations configured by > > default (db/dbfile/file) > > http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-536 > > > > I think we should put dbfile by default in the advanced config, but use > > db or file by default in the default config.xml. I have no real > > preference between the 2. I use db, but I think that most "first time" > > users would better understand the file repositories. > > db: > 2 +1 Stefano, Norman > > file: > 3 +1 Stefano, Vincenzo, Bernd > > dbfile: > > if no one else raise his voice on this issue we should change the > default to "file" for users and mail repository.
Ok i changed it to file and closed the issue. > > > --- Remove RepositoryManager and cornerstone-store-impl > > http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-515 > > > > +1 to remove it (backport the trunk change) > > (Bernd already replied against this, but it is not clear to me wether it > > was a -0 or a -1, so please cast a veto if you think it is needed, > > otherwise we can count the votes: please don't answer that we should > > decide the real plan because I don't believe we can actively discuss > > about what is alpha/beta/rc and what should teoretically be included in > > the branch. I really prefear e real vote on a real issue. We don't have > > a generic rule but at least we know if we agreed to include it or not). > > +1 Stefano, Norman > -0 Bernd > -1 Vincenzo *VETO* > This doesn't need more votes, I just removed this issue from our 2.3 > roadmap. > > > --- Functionality of DNSServer.getByName(String) is not symetric to > > java.net.InetAddress.getByName(String) > > http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-302 > > > > I would like to move this out from the 2.3 roadmap (2.4). We'll discuss > > wether to include this or not in 2.4/3.0 later. > > 4 +1 Stefano, Norman, Vincenzo, Bernd (WOW, the same for all ;-) ) > Updated JIRA (removed from the 2.3 roadmap) > > > --- Once we'll have decided what to include and included it we are ready > > for the next release. Do we want to call it 2.3.0b2 or 2.3.0rc1 ? > > > > here is my vote: > > +1 for 2.3.0b2 > > +0 for 2.3.0rc1 > > 2.3.0b2 > 3 +1 Stefano, Norman, Vincenzo > 1 +1 Bernd (if we include JAMES-496) > > 2.3.0rc1 > +1 Stefano > +1 Bernd (if we don't include JAMES-496) > -1 Norman > > I think we have to stick to 2.3.0b2 because 2.3.0rc1 has a -1. I whould like to change it to +1.. after using for a while now. > > Stefano bye Norman
signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil
