Am Montag, den 07.08.2006, 15:12 +0200 schrieb Stefano Bagnara: > We know that SUN made Javamail 1.4 and Activation 1.1 available under > the new CDDL license. > > The problem is that downloading this artifacts directly from > java.sun.com gives you signed jars including the OLD license file. > > To obtain binary/source JARs including the new CDDL license we have to > use the maven-repository where the glassfish project deploy the artifacts: > https://maven-repository.dev.java.net/nonav/repository/javax.mail/ > https://maven-repository.dev.java.net/nonav/repository/javax.activation/ > > This jars are not signed by sun. > > Currently in trunk I committed the mail.LICENSE and activation.LICENSE > files from the java.sun.com files, but I think we should better use the > CDDL licensed packages. I agree.
> > To satisfy the CDDL license we should also add to your LICENSE.txt the > link to product sources: > from the source repository browser: > https://glassfish.dev.java.net/source/browse/glassfish/mail/ > https://glassfish.dev.java.net/source/browse/glassfish/activation/ > or even the maven repo (that contains sources) > https://maven-repository.dev.java.net/nonav/repository/javax.mail/ > https://maven-repository.dev.java.net/nonav/repository/javax.activation/ Feel free to do it ;-) > > From what I understood from here: > http://people.apache.org/~cliffs/3party.html > CDDL is part of Category B and not prohibited. > > Does this means we can include the 2 jars in our svn lib folder like we > did for all the other BSD/MIT/PD artifacts? > > This would really simplify the job of building james from subversion > using only ant. > > Stefano Well, you are right if i understand it.. Anyone can confirm? bye Norman
signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil
