I guess we would rather need j1.4 binaries to avoid those nasty "Major Version 49 not supported" errors
Bernd On 9/12/06, Norman Maurer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hmm strange. Here is my version info: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/tmp/james-2.3.0rc3# java -version java version "1.5.0_05" Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standard Edition (build 1.5.0_05-b05) Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM (build 1.5.0_05-b05, mixed mode) Am Dienstag, den 12.09.2006, 11:46 -0400 schrieb Noel J. Bergman: > +1 > > But I am curious as to what you used to compile it. I've compiled with JDK > 1.4.2_09 and JDK 1.5.0_06, and the resulting file sizes are different in all > three cases (the two I built and the one you built). > > --- Noel > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > !EXCUBATOR:1,4506d6a745115858819825!
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
