Stefano, thanx very much! :-) I am eager to try this out.
Bernd On 10/1/06, Stefano Bagnara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Bernd, I think this was a bug in postage and I think I just fixed it. Please review my changes. Stefano Bernd Fondermann wrote: > Hi, > > Last night I ran the "release" scenario against RC4 with the current > Postage trunk. > The overall result has not changed from prev Server RCs. All test > mails were matched. > > But, as you might have noticed, Postage has a new mechanism to inspect > the mails it matches called validation. In our case (the default), > this is simply comparing the in/out sizes of both the binary and > textual mime parts. So, it is not looking at headers or so, only at > the 'load' data. > > Mostly they match but in 10% of the cases they don't. The sizes of the > binary mime part is greater than expected. If validation fails, its > always mail received internally and fetched with POP3, never through > SMTP. > > Maybe its a bug in Postage, maybe in James, maybe not a bug at all. I > have no time to investigate more on the weekend. > So I'd like to ask if somebody can try to reproduce or give a hint > where the problem might be. > I am planning to continue working on this problem starting Monday. > > > Bernd --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
