You got it ;-) bye Norman
Vincenzo Gianferrari Pini schrieb: > So what you mean is that the right thing to do is, if someone plans to > have something fixed/working for next-major is to *add* the next-major > fix version *without removing* the trunk label, right? Sounds correct. > > Vincenzo > > Noel J. Bergman wrote: >> Jürgen Hoffmann wrote: >> >> >>> All he is doing is that he is tagging certain jira-issues, >>> that they are fixed in the next-major >>> >> >> Well, that is the thing. They may or may not be. What there ARE >> closed in >> is trunk. I don't really care if they are listed against next-major, >> but >> when we actually have code for next-major (remember: trunk is copied, >> then >> PRUNED to become next-major), it may turn out that they are not >> resolved in >> next-major at all. >> >> All that I asked him to do was stop removing trunk as a label, since >> that IS >> where the issue is resolved. >> >> --- Noel >> >> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> >> > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > !EXCUBATOR:1,4564720253071762512537! --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
