Hi Vincenzo, i whould asspect that dnsjava will return Lookup.TRY_AGAIN on such cases. And thats what i check for ;-)
bye Norman > Hi Jürgen and Norman, > > I agree with you *if* I can be sure that at least one of *my* > nameservers (the ones queried by my James server) is able to reach the > net and doesn't resolve the target domain (no target nameservers found), > and anwers NXDOMAIN. But is it possible to figure it out? And does > Norman's fix take in account that? > > In other words, if all *my* nameservers are either unreachable, or are > themselves unable to forward the query, it means that there are > connection problems "on my side" and we can not "be pretty sure, that > there is no such Domain/MX Entry", and we should keep retrying. If > instead "an outer world" query is done then your reasoning is correct. > > I'm making a difference here between *my* nameservers and the *target > domain* nameservers. > > Am I right or I'm missing something here :-) ? > > Anyway, it is unacceptable to have a message bounce back only after one > week because there is a typo in the domain part of an address. > > Vincenzo > > Norman Maurer wrote: >> Hi Jürgen, >> >> that was exactly what i did. But then they all start complaining. Thats >> why i changed it to be configurable. >> >> bye >> Norman >> >> >>> Hi All, >>> >>> seriously, I disagree with how you expect DNS to work. A Domain has >>> configured "n" Nameservers that are responsible for Name resolution. So >>> I >>> would expect James to use all of them in a loop fashion. >>> >>> If all Nameservers fail with "NXDOMAIN", or we cannot even determine, >>> that >>> there is not even one Nameserver for a given Domainname available, we >>> can >>> be pretty sure, that there is no such Domain/MX Entry. >>> >>> So I would really like to handle this differently. >>> >>> - If it is not possible to determine nameservers, bounce with perm >>> error >>> - If there are nameservers available, but not reachable, queue the >>> Mail. >>> >>> Does this make sense? >>> >>> Kind Regards >>> >>> Juergen >>> >>> >>> >>> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- >>> Von: Steve Brewin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> Gesendet: Sonntag, 26. November 2006 18:39 >>> An: 'James Developers List' >>> Betreff: RE: Permanent errors from transient DNS issues? >>> >>> Norman Maurer wrote: >>> >>> >>>> Ok.. RemoteDelivery now supports to configure a diffrent >>>> retry for such >>>> DNS "issues". Even if i not like it .. Anyway i hope now all >>>> are happy.. >>>> >>> :) Thanks Norman. >>> >>> -- Steve >>> >>> >>>> bye >>>> Norman >>>> >>>> >> > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > !EXCUBATOR:1,456ae2fb53071335268197! > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
