Some of this conversation is difficult to follow as I don't know who's who. However, it seems that the current consensus is to attach the current source it as a JIRA issue and go from there... Is a CLA required for to submit the issue, or does that only become necessary when it's time to commit the patch?
Tom On 12/30/06, robert burrell donkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 12/30/06, Stefano Bagnara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > robert burrell donkin wrote: > >> I don't like too much the use of svn:externals. Either way we'll have to > >> wait for the legal issues to be resolved in order to try to release. > > > > sorry for not explaining fully: i meant to suggest starting a project > > which imported the last james release and added the extra function not > > vice-versa. those who want james+domain-keys and are happy with the > > reciprocal licensing could obtain it from this new project. > > I would not reccomend branches. I prefer to alter james in order to > provide the needed extension points so that the code can be a plugin and > added to the official james with few efforts. I wouldn't like to see > James branches for each feature that is not patent or copyright > compliant (like jcluster, maildir and so on). I think this is my duty to > try to avoid this while I'm in the PMC. easier plugins would be very useful anyway - robert --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
