On 1/8/07, Stefano Bagnara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Bernd Fondermann wrote:
> We should continue to make sure James is running with Java versions > 1.4
> And I am +1 for a future version of the mailet engine to require Java 5.
> About requiring Java 5 for the Server, I don't know. Why should the
> Server require Java 5 if it really does not use any J5 specifics and
> only one of its subprojects does?
I think we don't require Java 5 simply because we chose to not use java
5 features :-) . I bet that if we start requiring java 5 then we'll soon
see generics, @override, enum and other useful stuff all over the code.
ok, but that is a different motivation and worth a proposal of its own :-)
Server could really benefit from those new language features.
It would require major changes in the code.
...and I am already off-topic ;-)
Bernd
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
