Bernd Fondermann wrote:
Imho this is not a big issue: the link point to the apache james team
page and the page show clearly an apache james project.

Well, in fact the page has no obvious ("clear") indication that this
is an Apache James project.
Except of course, somebody looks at the linked URLs.

 Bernd

Maybe the author of that page chose by purpose to use only the final name of the library: no library have references to the company/organization.

We never told him that "Stefano Bagnara, Norman Maurer" was the author of the library: Norman asked them to add jSPF and they added jSPF their own way.

Btw I'll be happy with anything different you will agree with them.

In the mean time you can also decide wether you/they want to add James Server to the "Mail Servers that natively support SPF" even if we only have this in trunk and not released it.

Thank you,
Stefano

PS: Maybe you're also interested in this: http://www.dnsjava.org/ also links to jSPF without "Apache" or "James" in the description.


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to