On 2/3/07, David Woldrich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I think your "James is a POJO chameleon" idea makes a lot of sense. If we make it easy for 3rd parties to wrap James up, they'd do the heavy lifting of packaging the code up for you and making it deployable to their systems. Is there anything screwy about picking the Spring framework as the official container into which James is poured? Couldn't that just be how James is shipped from the core team?
IMO Yes... but ... we first need to be sure that we haven't missed any subtle but fatal gotcha's d. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
