On 2/11/07, Stefano Bagnara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
robert burrell donkin ha scritto:
> rather than waiting for a big bang merger, i'd prefer to move the
> changes in incrementally a week or two behind the current branch. so,
> i plan to cut a number of milestones so that developers can more
> easily understand what's going on and review a reasonable quantity of
> changes.
>
> opinions?
+1
Well, imho you could even use trunk as Joachim said he's not keen to
work here for a while, so you won't overlap with anyone.
Currently you are the only active committer, and you are working on a
"never released" component, so there is no fear to break backward
compatibity or something similar.
If skipping the merge operaions helps your workflow and gives you more
agility, I'm fine with it.
the milestone workflow suits me better (i test each milestone locally)
- robert
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
