On 5/15/07, Stefano Bagnara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
My suggestion is to place the core non-avalon code in the main class and then write an avalonized wrapper to that class (or an extended version implementing avalon interfaces).
+1 I would be stronger and say that that is a pattern which we would like to apply to all of James, separate POJO's with single responsibilities from wrappers which impose or implement lifecycle. d. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
