Danny Angus ha scritto: > On 5/17/07, Stefano Bagnara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > cenarios. >> Otherwise it will fit a very limited usecase and we'll have to skip the >> "let's use JCR as THE interface" proposed by Noel. > > I'm not convinced about that, we have two interfaces because we have > two distinct responsibilities and two different use cases (spool and > mail) > > I think that we really do need to find out what the performance is > actually like before we start trying to "fix" imaginary performance > issues for uncommon deployment scenarios.
Well, I can only report you what happened to me. We also have postage if you want to stress test some scenario. Again, I don't share your definition of "uncommon deployment scenarios", but I think this is not important. IMHO the important thing is to have new stuff: if it is architecturally wrong or limited to low traffic servers we can anyway start a different backend (or even a different server at all) when who have the problem will also have the time to work on it :-) Stefano --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
