robert burrell donkin schrieb: > On 5/16/07, Stefano Bagnara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> robert burrell donkin ha scritto: >> > On 5/15/07, Stefano Bagnara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > <snip> > >> > 2 MimeMessage does not play well with nio >> >> I agree, but: does mime4j helps in this? I dedicated it really few time >> and a lot of months ago, but if I remember correctly also mime4j gave me >> problems when I approached seda. > > not sure whether mime4j helps directly > > a richer writing API would be useful for server side code. with a > better variety of operations (for example, writing out all headers or > writing out a particular mime par) and a better variety of outputs > (for example, buffers or channels as well as streams).
Writting all headers is allready possible and writting bodyparts too. I introduced this methods some month ago . But I think mim4j is not really nio friendly yet :-/ > >> > 3 the automatic type conversions are unhelpful >> >> This is true for the mail server, not true (IMHO) for the mailet >> specification: mailet author have probably better life with >> automatically converted mime objects. > > depends on the mailet. being given given the choice of raw or > processed data would be great. +1 > >> > 4 automatic encoding conversions are unhelpful >> >> Same considerations as for 3. > > +1 > > - robert +1 Norman --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
