Re: [Mime4J] Support For Non-Streaming Inputs

[Jochen Wiedmann]

robert burrell donkin-2 wrote:
> 
> i'm not sure that they are necessarily mutally exclusive but i do
> believe that good support introduces complexity and leads to
> unnecessary debates about design
> 

And the proper place for that discussion seems to me to be when a proposed
patch comes up. IMO, the solution that I have developed is comparable to the
current in terms of complexity. It is also well suited for InputStream's (I
developed it with the goal in mind to improve the current implementations
performance with  a servlet input stream in mind) as well as byte buffers.
Whether it is actually faster, I cannot tell so far, because I am still
debugging. That can be seen when the benchmark is working.


Jochen

-- 
View this message in context: 
http://www.nabble.com/-Mime4J--Support-For-Non-Streaming-Inputs-tf4490104.html#a12835172
Sent from the James - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]