On 9/22/07, Jochen Wiedmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > robert burrell donkin-2 wrote: > > > > i'm not sure that they are necessarily mutally exclusive but i do > > believe that good support introduces complexity and leads to > > unnecessary debates about design > > > > And the proper place for that discussion seems to me to be when a proposed > patch comes up. IMO, the solution that I have developed is comparable to the > current in terms of complexity. It is also well suited for InputStream's (I > developed it with the goal in mind to improve the current implementations > performance with a servlet input stream in mind) as well as byte buffers.
your patch would require double buffering when used with direct buffers and would require convertion of structured data into bytes. so, it's unsatisfactory for use cases 1 and 2. however, i'm not sure whether this is something that is worthwhile arguing about. - robert --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
