On 11/6/07, Danny Angus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 06/11/2007, Robert Burrell Donkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > i think that this probably means that user information is going to > > need to be passed in (if anyone can see good alternatives, please jump > > in). > > I don't think that it needs to be a problem, is there a use case of a > mailbox without a user? > > d. >
Yes I think so. A shared mailbox which can be seen by multiple users. Zs
