Danny Angus ha scritto: > On 06/11/2007, Robert Burrell Donkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> i think that this probably means that user information is going to >> need to be passed in (if anyone can see good alternatives, please jump >> in). > > I don't think that it needs to be a problem, is there a use case of a > mailbox without a user? > > d.
I think that when you store a message into a mailbox (LocalDelivery) you don't have a real user, unless we introduce a "Spooler" or "Remote" user to be used in that use case (I don't like it too much). The user is there only when you access the mailbox via an IMAP/POP3 client. In POP3 there is no need to propagate the user to the backend because the permissions are simple enough to be managed by the POP3 layer, but if I understood it, in IMAP they preferred to manage permissions at the mailboxmanager level. Stefano --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
