I actually meant instead of mailets altogether, but hey, :-) On 21/11/2007, Robert Burrell Donkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Nov 21, 2007 1:19 PM, Danny Angus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 21/11/2007, Tim Stephenson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Has anyone ever asked for or considered allowing more than one matcher > > > per mailet? > > > > Yes, we have considered it for inclusion in the next generation of the API. > > > > > a more elegant solution would appear to be to support more than one > > > matcher per mailet, how feasible is that? Any pointers to where i > > > should be looking to implement this would also be appreciated. > > > > You have three choices here > > <snip> > > > 3/ use jseive instead > > this is an interesting idea and probably do-able without too much problems > > an extension MailetCommand would need to be developed (for an example, see 1) > > - robert > > 1. > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/james/jsieve/trunk/src/main/java/org/apache/jsieve/commands/extensions/Log.java > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
