On 22/11/2007, Tim Stephenson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > do you have any comments / advice on if this is a good idea or would > be of any interest within James 3 (or whatever it will be known as)? > if i do go ahead it will only be the mailet container not the > fetchmail, smtp (or other) services which i'd like to be pluggable.
Tim its a great idea, subscribe to the mailet-api list. One thing I've wanted to do is to have an independant implementation of the API which we could use as a dev environment for mailets and also to make it easy for folks to add a mailet pipeline to their own applications. d. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
