On Dec 22, 2007 6:50 PM, Tim Stephenson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > An alternative would be that each jar file contains a single mail > processor and could therefore order the mailets it uses explicitly. > The spool manager would need to have its processors configured too so > the downside is this just pushes the configuration problem upstream, > though I guess the processors in use are much more stable than the > mailets that may be desired within the processor.
yes a typical JAMES deployment may have scores of mailets but only a handful of processors. each processor forms a single semantic unit so it seems like the right level of granularity. > In writing this I am also starting to think that hot-deployment is > less the issue than the modularity of deployment. +1 IMHO COP is the area which needs most work in JAMES - robert --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
