On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 9:08 PM, Robert Burrell Donkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 8:28 PM, Stefano Bagnara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > <snip> > > > I would have preferred to vote on the actual classes to be moved there, > > because I agree that mailet-base is needed, but I don't know if we agree on > > what to move there ;-) > > i don't see the point arguing about details unless the principle is > agreed. there's no real reason to vote on contents anyway: should be > able to reach a reasonable consensus > > > IMO Generic*, RFC2822Headers and the "dates" package should be moved > there. > > +1
might also move org.apache.james.util.mailet.* from server the question is how much toolkit is worthwhile moving in as well. it would be better if standard mailets were just a runtime dependency. this would mean moving some abstract implementations into base: AbstractQuotaMatcher AbstractAddFooter this would mean subtly changing base from pure utilities into something a little more like a mailet-building toolkit. opinions? - robert --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
