Robert Burrell Donkin ha scritto:
On Sat, Apr 26, 2008 at 12:46 AM, Stefano Bagnara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Robert Burrell Donkin ha scritto:
<snip>
the question is how much toolkit is worthwhile moving in as well. it
would be better if standard mailets were just a runtime dependency.
this would mean moving some abstract implementations into base:
AbstractQuotaMatcher
AbstractAddFooter
this would mean subtly changing base from pure utilities into
something a little more like a mailet-building toolkit.
opinions?
I'm a little against moving the 2 Abstract classes to mailet-base.
reasons?
It is difficult to explain. Take it as a personal taste/feeling ;-)
I wrote "a little" because of this, otherwise I would have had a much
stronger opinion!
IMHO they are not generic/good/flexible enough to be part of a
toolkit/utility library.
Stefano
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
