On Mon, May 5, 2008 at 10:07 AM, Stefano Bagnara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Robert Burrell Donkin ha scritto: > > > > i can happily live without any more JAMES server releases. the plan to > > release JAMES as a series of loosely coupled embeddable libraries > > works very well for me. but from a community perspective, being able > > to work together to create new JAMES server releases would be healthy. > > perhaps we should set history aside and just adopt a release process > > which other projects have found solves the proving issue. > > > > I guess we already know how to do this. As you can see in my other reply to > this thread we made two 2.3.0 alpha releases from trunk in feb and may 2006. > Then we branched for one more alpha, 3 betas and 4 release candidates during > a 4 months period before a final release.
the key difference is that the same release passes through a number of different stages. a problem with the above is that encourages development paralysis. either the code has to be forked or development is frozen for long periods. both of which are harmful. - robert --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
