Robert Burrell Donkin ha scritto:
On Mon, May 5, 2008 at 10:07 AM, Stefano Bagnara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Robert Burrell Donkin ha scritto:
i can happily live without any more JAMES server releases. the plan to
release JAMES as a series of loosely coupled embeddable libraries
works very well for me. but from a community perspective, being able
to work together to create new JAMES server releases would be healthy.
perhaps we should set history aside and just adopt a release process
which other projects have found solves the proving issue.
I guess we already know how to do this. As you can see in my other reply to
this thread we made two 2.3.0 alpha releases from trunk in feb and may 2006.
Then we branched for one more alpha, 3 betas and 4 release candidates during
a 4 months period before a final release.
the key difference is that the same release passes through a number of
different stages. a problem with the above is that encourages
development paralysis. either the code has to be forked or development
is frozen for long periods. both of which are harmful.
Sorry, I probably misunderstood the sentence I quoted.
Can you say it again with different words? (concrete checklist/roadmap
would be perfect to avoid my misunderstanding ;-) ).
Stefano
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
