On Sat, May 10, 2008 at 1:12 PM, Stefano Bagnara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Robert Burrell Donkin ha scritto: >> >> On Sat, May 10, 2008 at 11:49 AM, Stefano Bagnara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
<snip> >>> 2) Added the rat checks to the pom so I was able to run rat easily. >>> Everything is ok but I had to add this excludes: >>> <exclude>NOTICE.base</exclude> >>> <exclude>LICENSE.apache</exclude> >>> they are used by the ANT build to put "better" NOTICE/LICENSE in the >>> resulting jars. >>> >>> <exclude>src/site/resources/rfc2234.txt</exclude> >>> <exclude>src/site/resources/rfc2244.txt</exclude> >>> <exclude>src/site/resources/rfc2298.txt</exclude> >>> <exclude>src/site/resources/rfc3028.txt</exclude> >>> They are rfc: do they need a license header? >> >> they include a license header just not an Apache one ;-) it should be >> retained unchanged. >> >> i'm not sure whether to remove them complete and just use links or to >> add a LICENSE.rfcs document at top level (since we only distribute >> them with the source). > > rfc are documents not likely to be removed from the internet so I think > there is no need to include them in our source distribution and we can > simply use links in our website. > > It does not make sense to worry about licensing and notice for not critical > files: let's remove them. i quite like them but can easily live without them. i've removed them. - robert --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
