On Sat, May 24, 2008 at 1:22 PM, Oleg Kalnichevski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sat, 2008-05-24 at 07:05 +0100, Robert Burrell Donkin wrote: >> On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 7:29 PM, Oleg Kalnichevski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
<snip> >> > Can I be of help? >> >> yes >> >> a great place to start would be by reviewing the bug list on JIRA >> > > MIME4J-30, MIMEJ4-40 and MIMEJ4-41 appear to have an acceptable > solution. It is just a matter of applying the patch. quite possibly. i'll take a look. > I can look into fixing MIME4J-20. that'd be great :-) > Can MIME4J-5 and MIME4J-6 be pushed to 0.5, though? ATM performance isn't great especially for large messages. this needs to be addressed. anyone want to take a look into them? but i see no reason to delay a 0.4 to fix them - robert --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
