On Sun, May 25, 2008 at 1:04 PM, Oleg Kalnichevski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sun, 2008-05-25 at 11:27 +0100, Robert Burrell Donkin wrote: >> On Sun, May 25, 2008 at 8:18 AM, Robert Burrell Donkin >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > On Sat, May 24, 2008 at 1:22 PM, Oleg Kalnichevski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> > wrote: >> >> On Sat, 2008-05-24 at 07:05 +0100, Robert Burrell Donkin wrote: >> >>> On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 7:29 PM, Oleg Kalnichevski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> >>> wrote: >> > >> > <snip> >> > >> >>> > Can I be of help? >> >>> >> >>> yes >> >>> >> >>> a great place to start would be by reviewing the bug list on JIRA >> >>> >> >> >> >> MIME4J-30, >> >> i'll ping jochen to see whether he wants to commit his local fork >> before 0.4 or not >> >> >> MIMEJ4-40 and MIMEJ4-41 appear to have an acceptable >> >> solution. It is just a matter of applying the patch. >> > >> > quite possibly. i'll take a look. >> >> no rights for patches so created tests and fixes from scratch >> >> oleg could you check whether >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MIME4J-34 needs more work? >> > > Robert > > In my opinion it does not. At least from my biased point of view.
if you could update the JIRA outlining the deficiencies of the current codebase then we can take a look at sorting them out - robert
