[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MIME4J-51?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12619501#action_12619501
]
Stefano Bagnara commented on MIME4J-51:
---------------------------------------
Applied the proposed repackaging.
Please make suggestions on how to deal with the remaining classes we have in
the util package.
Bernd made this suggestiosn:
-----
For me, from a user perspective, MimeStreamParser.java and
MimeTokenStream.java are the most central classes, so they deserve
being easily found - at best in mime4j. Alternatively, we could have a
package javadoc in mime4j referring to these classes, ideally with
some example code.
-----
This is a TODO, contributions accepted.
> Remove cyclic dependencies and provide better organization of the source tree.
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: MIME4J-51
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MIME4J-51
> Project: Mime4j
> Issue Type: Task
> Affects Versions: 0.3
> Reporter: Stefano Bagnara
> Assignee: Stefano Bagnara
> Fix For: 0.4
>
>
> Robert started a topic about reorganizing the source tree.
> I proposed to remove cyclic dependencies.
> This JIRA issue is to track this effort and to document the change in the
> changelog once finished.
> I also created a branch with a proposal from mine:
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/james/mime4j/branches/repackaging-proposal/
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
