On Thu, Aug 21, 2008 at 8:28 AM, Stefano Bagnara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Oleg Kalnichevski ha scritto: >> >> On Wed, 2008-08-20 at 10:58 +0200, Stefano Bagnara wrote: >>> >>> Oleg Kalnichevski ha scritto: >>>> >>>> Folks >>>> >>>> It appears you have the entire project web site checked into the SVN >>>> repository including Maven generated reports >>>> >>>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/james/site/trunk/www/mime4j/ >>>> >>>> The idea of storing javadocs, xrefs and similar seems somewhat bizarre >>>> to me. I somehow fail to see any tangible benefits of doing so. >>>> Anyways, >>>> I'll follow the standard procedure without asking too many questions. >>> >>> I totally agree. On my turn I made questions. >>> >>> Noel was the champion for this idea. From a recent discussion in infra I >>> understand that this was a requirement when people.a.o was not backupped, >>> but infra team agreed that this can be relaxed now. >>> >>> I think we'll need a proposal/vote in order to change the current >>> practice, but I'm 100% +1 on a similar change. >> >> Does this really take a formal vote if no one raises any objections? > > No. History proved that my "formal ways" don't work here, so you have for > sure better chance using any different way ;-)
do infrastructure now guarantee that /www/james.apache.org/ is backed up? - robert --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
