Robert Burrell Donkin ha scritto:
On Thu, Aug 21, 2008 at 8:28 AM, Stefano Bagnara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Oleg Kalnichevski ha scritto:
On Wed, 2008-08-20 at 10:58 +0200, Stefano Bagnara wrote:
Oleg Kalnichevski ha scritto:
Folks
It appears you have the entire project web site checked into the SVN
repository including Maven generated reports
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/james/site/trunk/www/mime4j/
The idea of storing javadocs, xrefs and similar seems somewhat bizarre
to me. I somehow fail to see any tangible benefits of doing so.
Anyways,
I'll follow the standard procedure without asking too many questions.
I totally agree. On my turn I made questions.
Noel was the champion for this idea. From a recent discussion in infra I
understand that this was a requirement when people.a.o was not backupped,
but infra team agreed that this can be relaxed now.
I think we'll need a proposal/vote in order to change the current
practice, but I'm 100% +1 on a similar change.
Does this really take a formal vote if no one raises any objections?
No. History proved that my "formal ways" don't work here, so you have for
sure better chance using any different way ;-)
do infrastructure now guarantee that /www/james.apache.org/ is backed up?
Read the recent "Automating parts of the web site publishing process" on
[EMAIL PROTECTED] list.
Jukka asked to relax the point that generated content must be committed
to svn, Joes replied that we now have good backups and the requirement
can be relaxed.
From my understanding the requirement is now that what we publish is
generated from svn committed content so that we review any change.
Stefano
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
