<snip />

>>
>> I plan to submit an integration talk Geronimo/JAMES.
>
> What did you have in mind?

Don't know any details yet. In case the talk gets accepted, I'll work
out the details.

> There's been a continual stream of
> geronimo-javamail bug fixes.... are you planning to talk about using
> geronimo-javamail in james or running james inside geronimo?

The latter.

> I haven't seen
> any activity on the latter since I got a geronimo-james plugin sort of
> working.  There are a few obvious improvements that ought to be easy to
> implement there by someone who knows how james works a bit but are too hard
> for me with the time I have available.
> -- in memory transport for sending and receiving mail
> -- jpa rather than torque
> -- in memory ldap integration with apacheds plugin and the new ldap centric
> apacheds api
>
> I would really like to see this integration improved and will help as well
> as I can from the geronimo end of things.

+1, although I can't get to this in the foreseeable future because I
have already too much in my todo list. :-/

  Bernd

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to