On Oct 23, 2008, at 11:00 AM, Robert Burrell Donkin wrote:

On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 6:36 AM, Bernd Fondermann
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
<snip />

<snip>

I haven't seen
any activity on the latter since I got a geronimo-james plugin sort of working. There are a few obvious improvements that ought to be easy to implement there by someone who knows how james works a bit but are too hard
for me with the time I have available.
-- in memory transport for sending and receiving mail

interesting: what did you have in mind?

Aside from possibly using the connection pool, transactional, and jpa support offered by a javaee app server, it seems to me that the main reason you'd be running james inside geronimo would be if your ee apps needed to send or receive mail. It seems to me that there should be no need to go over tcp if both ends are running in the same jvm., delivery ought to be calling a method directly on the mail server. Maybe this is already possible..... my ignorance about mail and james is still almost total.



-- jpa rather than torque

this is on my list but i'd like to cut an IMAP milestone first

-- in memory ldap integration with apacheds plugin and the new ldap centric
apacheds api

LDAP integration would be very cool

I would really like to see this integration improved and will help as well
as I can from the geronimo end of things.

+1, although I can't get to this in the foreseeable future because I
have already too much in my todo list. :-/

may we'll get to some of it before ApacheConEU

I hope so!
thanks
david jencks



- robert

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to