On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 6:23 PM, Boris Burtin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> ----- "Robert Burrell Donkin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> just FYI there's currently a standardisation effort underway for xml
>> representation of sieve scripts
>> http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-freed-sieve-in-xml-01.txt
>>
>> 1 maybe you'd be in a position to provide useful feedback
>
> Hey Robert.  Thanks for pointing this out.  I didn't realize that others are 
> thinking about representing filter rules as XML.  I think our goals at Zimbra 
> are a bit >different.

maybe, maybe not :-)

IMHO the current standards effort is skewed towards big *nix vendors
but there are a number of people also interested in other types of
applications.

> For simplicity's sake, we limit the kinds of scripts that users can generate. 
>  This makes it easier to write a UI-based filter rule editor.

AIUI there are a number of people interested in this. it may be
possible to make contact with them through the standards list.

>A general-purpose XML mapping is more than we need at this point.  I'll keep 
>this RFC in the back of my mind if we need to expand the filtering 
>functionality >in the future.

IMO a lot of the current standards effort is unfortunately skewed towards

>> 2 a suitable visitor might be useful for standard or custom
>> transformation to xml
>
> I wrote a visitor framework for what I'm doing, just to maintain my sanity 
> with tree navigation.  Currently there's a good amount of Zimbra-specfic 
> stuff i there. > Let me poke around and see if I can split out the general 
> node navigation code.  Should be easy enough to write a Node->String 
> converter once that's in > > place.

great

i think that it should be possible reasonably quick to come up with a
visitor framework that would allow pluggable translation to xml. even
if it's coded from scratch, feedback from one real life application
would be very useful.

- robert

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to