On Wed, Nov 19, 2008 at 1:09 PM, Robert Burrell Donkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, Nov 19, 2008 at 9:30 AM, Stefano Bagnara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Robert Burrell Donkin ha scritto: >>> opinions? >> >> Unless there is someone willing to work on that code I think it is bad >> to move it out. > > the code has very little visibility within James. a mini-site would > have more visibility. > > i agree with norman's point that the bayesian code is potentially > reusable if it were in a separate library > >> Otherwise we'll end up with a microlibrary for the ClamAVScanner, for >> the SpamAssassinInvoker, for the NetworkMatcher and so on. > > i like micro-libraries :-) > > they've also proved very successful over the years
on balance, it's important to choose the right granularity. probably better to pick a cohesive topic. i'm very interested in using machine learning with mail. if anyone starts to be become interested in developing any more machine learning mailets, we can factor it out at that stage. - robert --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
