Hi, I still think it would be good to factor it out.. there aren't enought good java based spamfilter libraries out there... I think many developers would us our work if it would be possible and visible to them.
Cheers, Norman 2008/11/21 Robert Burrell Donkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > On Wed, Nov 19, 2008 at 1:09 PM, Robert Burrell Donkin > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Wed, Nov 19, 2008 at 9:30 AM, Stefano Bagnara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > >> Robert Burrell Donkin ha scritto: > >>> opinions? > >> > >> Unless there is someone willing to work on that code I think it is bad > >> to move it out. > > > > the code has very little visibility within James. a mini-site would > > have more visibility. > > > > i agree with norman's point that the bayesian code is potentially > > reusable if it were in a separate library > > > >> Otherwise we'll end up with a microlibrary for the ClamAVScanner, for > >> the SpamAssassinInvoker, for the NetworkMatcher and so on. > > > > i like micro-libraries :-) > > > > they've also proved very successful over the years > > on balance, it's important to choose the right granularity. probably > better to pick a cohesive topic. i'm very interested in using machine > learning with mail. if anyone starts to be become interested in > developing any more machine learning mailets, we can factor it out at > that stage. > > - robert > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >
