On Sun, Dec 14, 2008 at 4:12 PM, Stefano Bagnara <[email protected]> wrote: > Robert Burrell Donkin ha scritto: >> On Sun, Dec 14, 2008 at 2:49 PM, Norman Maurer <[email protected]> wrote: >>> Should I just go ahead an commit it ( and open a jira issue) ? >> >> if we follow stefano's design reasoning then really the VUT code needs >> to be moved from LocalDelivery into a separate mailet > > I'm not following you. Norman patch does touch the LocalDelivery, if I > understand it.
LocalDelivery uses UsersRepositoryAliasingForwarding and the code in it > IMO it can be committed. +1 > It seems it simply fixes a previously "partial" > work: > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-615 > > Also, if you are interested in revamping/refreshing/fixing the user > stuff in james I can give you 2 more pointers in hour "history": > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-622 i've talked phoenix into not using proxies now so some of the extra complexity can be removed > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-745 thanks - robert --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
