Robert Burrell Donkin ha scritto: > On Sun, Dec 14, 2008 at 4:12 PM, Stefano Bagnara <[email protected]> wrote: >> Robert Burrell Donkin ha scritto: >>> On Sun, Dec 14, 2008 at 2:49 PM, Norman Maurer <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> Should I just go ahead an commit it ( and open a jira issue) ? >>> if we follow stefano's design reasoning then really the VUT code needs >>> to be moved from LocalDelivery into a separate mailet >> I'm not following you. Norman patch does touch the LocalDelivery, if I >> understand it. > > LocalDelivery uses UsersRepositoryAliasingForwarding and the code in it
IMO the current aliasingforwarding stuff could be deprecated and I find it very "weird" and unintuitive in the way it works. The whole refactoring was about allowing it to be excluded and replaced with a different solution without breaking backward compatibility (I was only working inside the agreed constraints, but in italy we say "a lot of water passed under the bridges" since that). >> IMO it can be committed. > > +1 > >> It seems it simply fixes a previously "partial" >> work: >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-615 >> >> Also, if you are interested in revamping/refreshing/fixing the user >> stuff in james I can give you 2 more pointers in hour "history": >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-622 > > i've talked phoenix into not using proxies now so some of the extra > complexity can be removed I saw! I didn't know phoenix had this option :-( , and this should make it things much more simple. Thank you! >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-745 > > thanks Stefano --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
