Markus Wiederkehr ha scritto: > Probably kind of a noob question: how do you usually decide whether to > resolve or close a JIRA?
How we do is not the best thing :-) > I realise that closed is intended to be the final state in a workflow, > but then what purpose serves the resolved state? Is resolved more > likely to be reopened? How we should do is: "resolve" an issue as soon as a commit that is expected to solve the issue is applied. The reporter should be expected to confirm that it is resolved in a satisfactory way and close the issue, or otherwise it could be closed after "a while". > I have also noticed that the majority of the Mime4j issues have been > resolved (59) instead of closed (33).. Is this correct? Most of resolved issues in mime4j and server-dev should probably be closed, IMO. Stefano --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
