Hi all,

Here's a thought/feeling I've been having for a while regarding JAMES, as a user of many years (both at work and at home). It's not at all meant as a rant, but as the personal experience of a long time user who really wants to see this project thrive - this is how it looks from the 'outside'. [reposted from elsewhere - oops :-) ]


Speaking for myself, I can't exactly say that I'm interested in more releases and features from a 2.x codebase with no active developers, targeted at Java 1.4 (won't even compile on 6), with chunks of the project's wiki (even task-related pages) last updated 4 years ago, based on some framework projects that have been discontinued years ago... at least that's the impression the project is making in the past couple of years - that it is a dying one.

But, I wouldn't want to abandon it either. As a user, the alternatives are either the above, or a trunk 3.0 version whose status, progress and future is not quite clear either - there's a v3 wiki page that was last updated at the beginning of 2005! Perhaps it's time for a proper alternative? Perhaps an alpha/beta of 3, with a fresh feeling of liveliness? Something to show a clear sign of activity and progress? cleaning up the wiki from ancient roadmaps and plans which have been abandoned long ago? I think that feeling of freshness would make it much easier to contribute than the current uninviting feeling of gloom... I contribute to several projects in what spare time I've got, and this one always gets pushed to the bottom of the list because of that feeling of 'who knows if it's not already dead? Are there more than a dozen users still using it? haven't seen any movement there in months, years... why not work on that other well-supported project instead?' Or to paraphrase the well known quote - "contributors contribute to those projects who help themselves"...

...is it just me?

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to