Hi Robert, when you say "(OpenJPA and Jackrabbit) which are nearly there" you just refer to OpenJPA right ? Because I was not able to find any JCR code in trunk.
Bye, Norman 2010/1/7 Robert Burrell Donkin <[email protected]>: > On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 3:26 PM, Robert L. Gurule <[email protected]> wrote: >> Hi All, >> >> I am interested in the James IMAP code, what are the plans for IMAP? I >> am interested in helping out on this effort. > > cool :-) > > it's a good time to get involved. the functional test suite works well > now and catch most problems. i've been running IMAP for the last > couple of years now. > > in turns of plans - plenty of opportunities to get involved but no plans as > such > > if you like concurrency then IMAP will run quite a bit quicker > asynchronously and it should be reasonably easy to use asynchronous > I/O > > if you prefer data access then there are a couple of implementations > (OpenJPA and Jackrabbit) which are nearly there > > if you like protocols and standards, pick one of the unimplemented IMAP > standard > > if you like crypto then StartTLS is close to working > > - robert > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
